← Suggested Reading
Cover of Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth

Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth

Bart D. Ehrman

Bart D. Ehrman’s Did Jesus Exist? is essential reading for students of the New Testament and historians interested in the "Christ Myth" theory. Utilizing a rigorous critical-historical methodology, Ehrman dismantles the claim that Jesus was a fictional adaptation of pagan dying-and-rising deities. By analyzing early traditions and the evolution of Christology, he demonstrates that Jesus was a historical figure whose divinity was a later theological development. Highly recommended for serious scholars.

Buy on Amazon →

Full review

In Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth, Bart D. Ehrman provides a rigorous defense of the historical existence of Jesus, specifically challenging the mythicist claim that Jesus was a Jewish adaptation of a pagan "dying and rising god." Ehrman’s central contribution is the systematic dismantling of the mythicist thesis through a critical analysis of ancient religious texts and first-century Jewish contexts. He argues that evidence for dying and rising deities is fragmented and unclear, lacking any documented presence in Jerusalem or rural Palestine during the 20s CE. Furthermore, he demonstrates that the characteristics of such figures differ significantly from the portrayal of Jesus, rendering the theory that Jesus was modeled after pagan myths unlikely.

This work is essential for serious students of the New Testament and historians of early Christianity who wish to distinguish between theological inquiry and historical analysis. Ehrman meticulously separates the actual nature of the historical Jesus from the evolving beliefs of his followers. He argues that the synoptic Gospels and early pre-Pauline traditions do not identify Jesus as divine, but rather as a human agent of God. He clarifies that the title "Son of God" in a first-century Jewish context denoted a special relationship with the divine—similar to the role of the king of Israel—rather than an assertion of deity.

What sets this scholarship apart is Ehrman's exhaustive treatment of complex passages like Philippians 2:6–11. He argues that this poetic text describes a process of exaltation and reward for obedience rather than a cycle of a dying god. By analyzing the "form of God" as an appearance rather than an immutable essence, he posits that Jesus attained his status through the resurrection. For the scholarly reader, this book is highly recommended as a primer in historical-critical methodology. It should be approached as a study in the development of early Christian christology, moving from the belief in Jesus's complete humanity to his later conceptualization as a divine being.